Question

Topic: E-Marketing

Retailers And Their Use Of Images In E-mails.

Posted bymicheleaon 25 Points
I've been doing a lot of research in to e-mail template designs recently and every book/site I've read states you must have a good text to image ratio.

However, I'm a little puzzled when I see shops like Dorothy Perkins, Topman, etc use pretty much nothing but images in their e-mails and they still manage to get through spam filters!

Is anyone able to tell me how they manage to beat the spam filters with (pretty much) nothing but images in their e-mails?
To continue reading this question and the solution, sign up ... it's free!

RESPONSES

  • Posted byJay Hamilton-Rothon Member
    Spam filters look at more than simply words - they also look at the IP address of the sender, trusted whitelisting, etc.
  • Posted byPeter (henna gaijin)on Member
    The text to image ratio is just one factor used when determining spam. The examples you provided may see a slightly higher flagged as spam rate, but because it is come from a white listed email, doesn't use domains that are considered questionable, doesn't have flagged words, etc., many still get through. Perhaps a few more would get through if they used less images, but then it would have a different look and feel which may reduce their effectiveness.
  • Posted byDane Robbinson Accepted
    More and more, the reputation of the sender AND the engagement of the audience play a greater role in e-mail delivery than spam filter scores alone (such as html to image ratios). Companies that have whitelisting programs (mentioned previous by Jay Hamilton-Roth), engage in paid certification from Return Path or similar vendor programs, and use e-mail services with aged and established IP blocks (Silverpop, etc), usually have an easier time getting to the inbox. Spam rules shouldn't be ignored, but they alone won't guarantee inbox delivery.

    Gmail and Yahoo now use subscriber engagement in addition to other flags to determine junk vs. inbox placement. Engagement in this context means that if your subscriber rarely opens your e-mail message, you'll more likely go into junk because the ISP sees that your subscriber really doesn't value your messages. The quickest way around it is to have them add your e-mail address to their address book. But that is entirely another topic and doesn't answer your primary question. In the end the bigger companies get away with more because they are probably paying-to-play to some degree or have strong ISP relationships established.
  • Posted byDane Robbinson Member
    A discussion about engagement with Yahoo and Gmail:https://sendgrid.com/blog/yahoo-gmail-subscriber-engagement/
  • Posted bycookmarketing@gmail.on Member
    First - permission marketing - simply ask your potentials. Yes, more difficult. Yes, longer in collecting. Yes, on cost to responsing ratio
    Second - "eyes" have it for quick/emotional response

Post a Comment