Question

Topic: E-Marketing

Email Direct Marketing

Posted by Anonymous on 50 Points
What is better - an EDM piece that comes direct into a customers email and forms the body of text or topic links that take them to a web site - which one is more effective? Which one is customer friendly?
To continue reading this question and the solution, sign up ... it's free!

RESPONSES

  • Posted byInbox_Interactiveon Accepted
    This thread could turn into a real hornet's nest, as there are some circles in which this debate currently rages.

    (Yes, we are a sad lot.)

    There are basically two kinds of people in the world: those who think that HTML email is evil, and those who think that HTML is not only acceptable but preferable. Regardless of whether you're talking people who send email for a living or their subscribers, you have people in both camps.

    In the interest of keeping it short, I'll--well--keep it short.

    The best thing to do is simply ask people what kind of email they'd like. You should be able to split your file accordingly and push the right version to each recipient.

    但是,你的问题是:HTML和文本,(1)which is more effective, and (2) which is more customer friendly?

    Regrettably, those could very easily be two different answers.

    There is no doubt in my mind that, as someone who has managed email campaigns for over 100 companies, there is almost always (95% of the time?) better response with HTML than there is with text. Even in technology or business environments, people still respond better to pictures, colors, nice fonts, etc. Text is just text.

    And in some cases, pictures really are worth a thousand words. For example, one of our non-profit environmental clients sends a beautfiul full-color email each month; the open rate is over 85% each time. I have to think that the pictures of the animal species being defended in a given month keep readers engaged and concerned.

    Another nice advantage of text over HTML for the sender is that you can track the open rate.

    And even if you decide that your audience is a very businesslike crowd who would just as soon be rid of the pretty pictures, etc., that doesn't mean you have to bag HTML. You can just do a cleaner, less glitzy version of an HTML message, still taking advantage of various fonts and other layout opportunities that improve readability. (And you'll still have that open-rate tracking capability, although it is precisely this ability that makes HTML email the Devil in some people's eyes.)

    So, when all is said and done, I believe that an HTML message works better than a text message (even a text message that links back to a Web version of the message, something you should include on both the HTML and text versions of your email).

    我知道有些人会不同意. To each his own. As I said, the best advice is to ask what people would prefer and then deliver that to them.

    So much for keeping it short. :(

    Good luck,

    Paul
  • Posted bySRyan ;]on Member
    Alison, I think Paul and Matthew misunderstood your question.

    I agree with Pradeep -- If your email is about an assortment of "stories," you should summarize them and include links to the full text on the web. Kind of like the MarketingProfs e-newsletter, hmm?

    However, if it's only one topic per email, I'd put it all in there.

    - Shelley
  • Posted byInbox_Interactiveon Member
    If the question is, "Do we put the entire newsletter in an email, or do we push only headline, teasers, etc., and publish the entire newsletter on the Web?" then the answer is still, "It depends."

    I would try to keep your newsletter to no more than two horizontal scrolls, three absolute max. If you are going way over that, then you need to do the full-length version on the Web.

    Keep in mind, however, that if you fully self-contain the newsletter in an email, you won't generate any trackable clicks, so you won't know which articles were most interesting, and you won't know who clicked which articles.

  • Posted byInbox_Interactiveon Member
    I think there's still some ambiguity in your question.

    There are two possible questions here.

    1. Do people want full-color HTML or text?

    That question has been discussed.

    2. Do people want the full-length articles, or do they just want teasers, with the full-length articles appearing on the Web.

    That question has also been discussed.

    If you read all of the answers in their entirety, I am 99% sure you will find feedback to your question, questions, or any combination thereof. If not, let us know.

    Hopefully this will keep obfuscation to a minimum.

    :)

    Paul

Post a Comment